Insult controversy over Sita

Insult controversy over Sita: Demand for revocation of Academy Award.

National Literature Academy Award winning Oriya artist Dr. The discussion over an internet based life post by Rajendra Kishore Panda has now heightened. Rajendra's post has been blamed for offending  of a huge number of Hindus and culture darlings, while senior writer, reporter and analyst Shaswat Panigrahi has required the renouncement of the Academy Award. 

Outstandingly, on April 28, Drs. Panda posted on Facebook, which has started discussion step by step. In the post, he stated, "In Ashokban you are the assault of Ichchipara Ravana, you can breeze through the fire assessment so effectively, you are nobody." accordingly, Shaswat National Literature Academy president Chandrashekhar messaged Khambara. In it, he makes a coherent case to pull back the Academy Award from Rajendra Panda. 

Dr. Panda's post has been accused on a large number of Hindus and culture sweethearts. In this post, she portrays Sita Mata, the adored goddess of Hinduism, as a reviled lady. He likewise supported some Oriya writers in the counter culture hall to take action accordingly. The writers posted various sonnets via web-based networking media about Lord Rama and Mother Sita, which are amazingly revolting. "Such a distorted pattern has never been found in the realm of Oriya writing," he said.

In his grumbling, Shaswat asserted that Rajendra's post was "indecent". This has harmed the Hindus. Along these lines, a case ought to be documented in his name under Section 295 (an) of the IPC and Section 4 of the IT Act 2000. What's more, there are 10 criminal bodies of evidence against Rajendra, he said.

"Dr. Panda manhandled his opportunity to be an artist. Writing is firmly connected with culture. No longer can a bit of writing be an instrument against culture. He mishandled his opportunity to be an artist by offering obscene comments about his mom, Sita. What's more, he is attempting to stow away in the figurative domain. Utilizing his powerful qualifications as a Central Sahitya Akademi Award beneficiary and previous senior assistant, Dr. Panda is free and the law doesn't contact him. 

Portraying Dr. Panda's activities as "social psychological oppression," Eternal requested quick activity against him and the repudiation of the Academy Award. It merits referencing here that Dr. There was a great deal of contention and conversation via web-based networking media at the time about Panda's post.

Then again, Enei Dr. Rajendra Kishore Panda stated: There is nothing of the sort in verse. I re-posted the full sonnet after the debate emerged. "Inclination is given to ladies." 

"The artist composes verse willingly," he included. The claims are totally unmerited. There is nothing of the sort as a creator. "It basically went to our notification at that point. There are no hindrances to composing. "he stated, "In Ashokban you are the assault of Ichchipara Ravana, you can breeze through the fire assessment so effectively, you are nobody." accordingly, Shaswat National Literature Academy president Chandrashekhar messaged Khambara. In it, he makes a coherent case to pull back the Academy Award from Rajendra Panda. 

Dr. Panda's post has been accused on a large number of Hindus and culture sweethearts. In this post, she portrays Sita Mata, the adored goddess of Hinduism, as a reviled lady. He likewise supported some Oriya writers in the counter culture hall to take action accordingly. The writers posted various sonnets via web-based networking media about Lord Rama and Mother Sita, which are amazingly revolting. "Such a distorted pattern has never been found in the realm of Oriya writing," he said.

In his grumbling, Shaswat asserted that Rajendra's post was "indecent". This has harmed the Hindus. Along these lines, a case ought to be documented in his name under Section 295 (an) of the IPC and Section 4 of the IT Act 2000. What's more, there are 10 criminal bodies of evidence against Rajendra, he said.

"Dr. Panda manhandled his opportunity to be an artist. Writing is firmly connected with culture. No longer can a bit of writing be an instrument against culture. He mishandled his opportunity to be an artist by offering obscene comments about his mom, Sita. What's more, he is attempting to stow away in the figurative domain. Utilizing his powerful qualifications as a Central Sahitya Akademi Award beneficiary and previous senior assistant, Dr. Panda is free and the law doesn't contact him. 

Portraying Dr. Panda's activities as "social psychological oppression," Eternal requested quick activity against him and the repudiation of the Academy Award. It merits referencing here that Dr. There was a great deal of contention and conversation via web-based networking media at the time about Panda's post.

Then again, Enei Dr. Rajendra Kishore Panda stated: There is nothing of the sort in verse. I re-posted the full sonnet after the debate emerged. "Inclination is given to ladies." 

"The artist composes verse willingly," he included. The claims are totally unmerited. There is nothing of the sort as a creator. "It basically went to our notification at that point. There are no hindrances to composing. "

Post a comment

0 Comments